Shortly before taking office, Mayor Bill DeBlasio announced that he and
his family would move from Park Slope, Brooklyn to the official mayoral
residence of Gracie Mansion, nestled in Carl Schurz Park on the Upper
East Side. This has re-ignited a mini-debate as to whether or not mayors
should actually live in the official residence -- is it a tax-payer
funded luxury crash pad or a proper home befitting the CEO of the
nation's biggest city?
This is one of those issues where both sides of the debate are right and wrong.
During his decade-plus time in office, Mayor Bloomberg made a big deal
about not living in Gracie Mansion -- he thought if mayors lived there
it would cost taxpayers too much and reduce the usability of the house
for official functions. But others have said that the mayor should have a
home, that the mayor needs to place to live and have his and his
family's everyday needs catered to while he runs a city bigger than most
states and many countries.
Of course, we are now living in troubled economic, cash-strapped times.
Other cities have mayoral residences and their citizens are balking at paying
the bill when budgets for vital city services are being cut. Some mayors
of other cities are making a big show of not moving into the mansions
which begs the question: has the time of official mayoral residences
now passed?
P.S. What's interesting is that NYC mayors didn't have an official
residence until 1942 when Robert Moses convinced Mayor LaGuardia to move
into Gracie Mansion. This fascinating story provides the history of how
the official mayoral residence came to be (it was a rare instance of
Robert Moses actually engaging in an act of preservation).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep it civil, intelligent, and expletive-free. Otherwise, opine away.